3

I saw that the tag said "Use this tag for questions concerning gigabyte technology, a hardware manufaturer - not filesize." (I also submitted a suggested edit for the typo in the tag wiki - it previously said manufaturer.)

In that light, I made the following suggested edits:

https://superuser.com/review/suggested-edits/296709
https://superuser.com/review/suggested-edits/296713
https://superuser.com/review/suggested-edits/296714
https://superuser.com/review/suggested-edits/296715
https://superuser.com/review/suggested-edits/296716
https://superuser.com/review/suggested-edits/296718
https://superuser.com/review/suggested-edits/296719

I'm not sure what the correct way to batch clean up tags like this is, so I made a meta question. Can we go through questions so that the tag is used in a useful manner?

3
  • 1
    No need for an extra post, people will get to the review queue sooner or later. The tag is pointless in all regards btw and should be removed on sight.
    – Oliver Salzburg
    Oct 14, 2014 at 14:53
  • @OliverSalzburg Even where it's about the hardware manufacturer?
    – Pimgd
    Oct 14, 2014 at 14:53
  • 4
    @Pimgd - yup. See this meta about Manufacturer/Company tags: meta.superuser.com/questions/8402/…
    – Robotnik
    Oct 14, 2014 at 14:56

0

Reset to default

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .