## * [nhinkle](http://chat.stackexchange.com/users/1768/nhinkle) [asked](http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/5408139#5408139):* **With a diamond after your name, everything you say and do on the site will be perceived in a different way. How do you plan to handle this, especially when having discussions about site policy and scope decisions?** ---- ** [DragonLord](http://chat.stackexchange.com/users/11606/dragonlord) [answered](http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/5417995#5417995):** I'll continue to make decisions as I usually do, only that I'll try to serve as the voice of the community. Not much else will change. ** [Oliver Salzburg](http://chat.stackexchange.com/users/31226/oliver-salzburg) [answered](http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/5418005#5418005):** If I was elected, I would be very confident in my prior judgement regarding these topics. Thus, I doubt I would act differently. When in doubt, I would rely on my team mates before making unjust descicions. I would handle the user same way as I handle other disruptive users. I don't think it would be wise to classify users by their contributions. ** [slhck](http://chat.stackexchange.com/users/2463/slhck) [answered](http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/5418038#5418038):** I always felt that with a certain reputation level you become a representative for the site, even without being a moderator. Having a diamond next to the name would not change that feeling of responsibility. So, this would be nothing new, I guess. - ** [Ivo Flipse](http://chat.stackexchange.com/users/51/ivo-flipse) [noted](http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/5418074#5418074):** Which is probably why most of us prefer users with a great track record to become mods, basically they're already doing the work :) ** [Daniel Beck](http://chat.stackexchange.com/users/2582/daniel-beck) [answered](http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/5418145#5418145):** I am aware of that issue and even mentioned it in my nomination. I will continue to participate in regular policy discussions, and make it clear that it's my opinion I'm voicing. I don't see a problem with existing moderators doing so either. The exception is when I don't think I'm impartial, in that case I'll refrain from participating or will discuss it with other moderators first. ** [KronoS](http://chat.stackexchange.com/users/601/kronos) [answered](http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/5420086#5420086):** I feel that I haven't been that outspoken as it is, but I will be even more careful about what I say, making sure to respect others opinions. When it comes to site policy and scope decision I plan to use the FAQ and fellow mods as a resource in such discussions.