A while back, I asked a question about [how the Raspberry Pi compares][1], but it was closed as "Not Constructive". I don't see how. I'll break it down:

> As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit in our Q&A format.

Huh. Why?

> We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise,

Ummm. What? It's a comparison question. I'm asking for stats. Unless I'm an idiot, stats _are_ facts.

> but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion.

How? I'm _not_ asking which is better. I'm asking how they _compare_.

> If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.

It looks good to me. That's _why_ I asked.

> If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit your question or leave a comment.

It _already_ fits the rules from what I can tell!

Can anyone shed some light here?

 [1]: https://superuser.com/questions/592793/how-does-the-raspberry-pi-stack-up