<p>User Contributions to Stack Exchange are licensed under <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/" rel="nofollow">cc-wiki</a> with <a href="http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2009/06/attribution-required/">attribution required</a> so there's nothing wrong in copying, assuming the attribution is given</p> <p>To be clear, attribution required means:</p> <blockquote> <ul> <li>Visually indicate that the content is from Stack Overflow, Meta Stack Overflow, Server Fault, or Super User in some way. It doesn’t have to be obnoxious; a discreet text blurb is fine.</li> <li>Hyperlink directly to the original question on the source site (e.g., <a href="http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12345">http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12345</a>)</li> <li>Show the author names for every question and answer</li> <li>Hyperlink each author name directly back to their user profile page on the source site (e.g., <a href="http://stackoverflow.com/users/12345/username">http://stackoverflow.com/users/12345/username</a>)</li> </ul> </blockquote> <p>In this case, the site fails to do any of the above & is running violation of the licensing.</p> <p>In this case, <a href="http://meta.stackexchange.com/a/200178/133693">this meta question mentions how to report such scrapers</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>Send all reports of SCRAPERs to <code>[email protected]</code>. Please include:</p> <ul> <li>the URL of the copied post</li> <li>the URL of the original post on SE</li> <li>for high-rankers, the search string you used (and the name of the search engine, if not Google)</li> <li>any other details you noticed and want to share, because you're awesome</li> </ul> </blockquote>