[This question][1] is closed because it's opinion based.

It basically asks why <kbd>Ctrl</kbd> + <kbd>V</kbd> paste is not implemented in [PowerShell][2].

There's a comment below, "This can't really be answered by anyone except the PowerShell design team."


In my opinion, that doesn't mean a question should be closed.

For one, the PowerShell design team is also on the Internet; two, they might have written a blog post somewhere about it or put it somewhere in the specifications/RFC documentation; and three, there might be an obvious reason why it's not implemented.

I've seen many questions about why certain things are implemented in a certain way with good answers.

Examples:

 - [Why has Microsoft never implemented a loopback interface in Windows?][3]
 - [What's the point of ASCII mode in FTP?][4]
 - [Why was JavaScript implemented using prototypal inheritance?][5]
 - [Why is std::map implemented as a red-black tree?][6]
 - [Why is 'is' implemented as 'as'?][7]
 - [Why is "import" implemented this way?][8]

Even if people add opinionated answers, then the problem are the answers, not the question.

  [1]: https://superuser.com/questions/675619/why-doesnt-windows-command-prompt-still-support-ctrl-v
  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_PowerShell
  [3]: https://superuser.com/questions/278978/why-has-microsoft-never-implemented-a-loopback-interface-in-windows
  [4]: https://superuser.com/questions/4401/whats-the-point-of-ascii-mode-in-ftp
  [5]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2090613/why-was-javascript-implemented-using-prototypal-inheritance
  [6]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5288320/why-is-stdmap-implemented-as-red-black-tree
  [7]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2251310/why-is-is-implemented-as-as
  [8]: http://stackoverflow.com/q/18863483/210336