It might not have been obvious spam, but the users only other interaction with the site was [another near-advert][1] for this same piece of software a month and a half before (10K only link).  While normal users cannot see this it suggests that the poster may either be the author or an overly enthusiastic user.  

Neither posts are particularly good quality, well formatted or well explained.  Together with their only interest being this software does not cast them in a good light, we'd prefer objective reviews across a variety of things rather than a laser like focus on one product.

Resurrecting an old question to belch the name of your favourite piece of software takes care and attention, something that was not done here.

In all honesty if *all* I'd seen was your review post, I'd have given it a pass as well.  As it was, the user has a bit of a suspicious history.


  [1]: https://superuser.com/questions/961449/increase-brightness-of-external-monitor/1066133#1066133