Bare in mind that the content on the entire Stack Exchange network is licensed under the [Creative Commons Attribution - Share Alike][1] license, so others are allowed to copy and reuse the content as long as they attribute it to the source correctly.

The team have previously [defined][2] exactly what they expect of someone reusing the data to do:

> Let me clarify what we mean by attribution. If you republish this content, we require that you:
>
> 1. **Visually indicate that the content is from Stack Overflow, Meta Stack Overflow, Server Fault, or Super User in some way.** It doesn’t have to be obnoxious; a discreet text blurb is fine.
>
> 2. **Hyperlink directly to the original question** on the source site (e.g., http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12345)
>
> 3. **Show the author names** for every question and answer
>
> 4. **Hyperlink each author name** directly back to their user profile page on the source site (e.g., http://stackoverflow.com/users/12345/username) 

> By “directly”, I mean each hyperlink must point directly to our domain in standard HTML visible even with JavaScript disabled, and not use a tinyurl or any other form of obfuscation or redirection. Furthermore, the links must not be nofollowed.

The page you've [referenced][3] appears to do **all four**, and I can't see any `nofollow` on the links, so *to me* this appears to be a valid reuse of the [source question][4].

----

[Here][5] is the Meta Stack Overflow question that covers attribution issues (what I've said here mostly repeats that).

[1]: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
[2]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/08/defending-attribution-required/
[3]: http://answerleaks.com/any-information-asyncmaplite-trojan/superuser/321635
[4]: http://superuser.com/questions/321635/any-information-about-the-asyncmaplite-trojan/321665#321665
[5]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/24611/is-it-legal-to-copy-stack-overflow-questions-and-answers/24618#24618