I made a correction to a post [Does liquid cooling mean I no longer need to dust my machine?](http://superuser.com/review/suggested-edits/566201) but it was rejected.

Reject reason A (by Dave Becker): "This edit deviates from the original intent of the post. Even edits that must make drastic changes should strive to preserve the goals of the post's owner."

Err, no it doesn't: the intent of the post's owner was to stop foreign material from entering the PC case, as would be achieved with positive pressure inside the case. The post's owner accidentally gave a setup for negative pressure.

Reject reason B (by paradd0x): "This edit does not make the post even a little bit easier to read, easier to find, more accurate or more accessible. Changes are either completely superfluous or actively harm readability."

Of course it is more accurate: the intention of the post owner was to inform the OP how to keep foreign material out of the case, as would be achieved with a positive pressure inside the case. The post's owner accidentally gave a setup for negative pressure.

Am I missing something obvious?