Example: We have a question about SSDs, which is now **two years old**.

> ### [Are SSDs worth the money?](http://superuser.com/questions/240200/are-ssds-worth-the-money)
> 
> I've been hearing a lot of hype about the SSDs recently. I'm planning
> to buy a new machine as soon as Windows 7 gets released. My question
> is are SSDs worth the money on a new Windows 7 Laptop?

Now, here's this one:

> ### [Solid-State Drives pros and cons?](http://superuser.com/questions/318724/solid-state-drives-pros-and-cons)
> 
> <sub>There's already a thread here about the pros and cons of SSDs that has a lot of votes, so it tends to show up towards the top when you search for SSD info on here. Unfortunately, a lot of the info about pricing, reliability and performance is badly out of date.</sub> 
> 
> Same question, two years later: now that SSDs are cheaper, faster and
> presumably more reliable, what are the pros and cons?


----------


I am somewhat tempted to close it as too localized or NARQ (for obvious reasons) but still we could get some useful information from it as a CW.

My main argument is: **I'd rather have current and up-to-date information than a too popular two-year old question with its answers.**


  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/240200/are-ssds-worth-the-money