Skip to main content
14 votes
Accepted

Did I create, then fail my own review audit?

Questions can be pushed into the Reopen Votes queue either by an edit or a reopen vote. As you said, the only revisions were made by you after you saw the review item, so that couldn't have created ...
Ben N's user avatar
  • 41.4k
13 votes
Accepted

Why is this audit spam?

This particular user (could be more than one, I suppose) keeps coming back and promoting the use of "R-HUB remote support servers" despite the moderators continuing to destroy their accounts....
Spevacus's user avatar
  • 246
10 votes

Please be more careful with audit tests

The question states "Please be more careful with audit tests" but the question body appears to be accusing the audits of being "too hard". Sorry, but the onus is on you to ...
Tetsujin's user avatar
  • 50.1k
9 votes

Please don't turn new user's questions into audit tests

It is a terrible question - it isn't ok. The course of action preferred would have been to comment asking for extra information I was using after effects and my pc suddenly turned off it's a brand ...
Journeyman Geek's user avatar
  • 131k
7 votes

Please don't turn new user's questions into audit tests

Your suggestion would make the First Questions review queue nigh-on pointless I would hereby launch the request never to turn a question of a new user into an audit test! Your audit came from the '...
bertieb's user avatar
  • 7,485
7 votes

Does this constitute a high quality question? From review audit

At 1000 views per day it's the type Q&A thread that although simplistic gets lots of search engine hits. In general this type of question is poorly received by the community. With a few exceptions,...
bad_coder's user avatar
  • 635
6 votes
Accepted

Can the review system be fixed?

Sorry about that; this was completely broken for a few days, but it should be all good now.
Shog9's user avatar
  • 522
5 votes
Accepted

I messed up. What can I do? => This is an audit test

This is advice I recall receiving when I complained about failing an audit several years back: It isn't necessarily about whether the question should be closed or not, but about whether you as a ...
music2myear's user avatar
  • 44.1k
5 votes
Accepted

"Our system has identified this post as possible spam" - Audit

This is actually driven by the spam detection system, where posts or edits from untrusted networks can trigger the alert to help folks recognize the need to be extra-vigilant: The review system ...
Shog9's user avatar
  • 522
4 votes

Failed a few tests recently for reasons that fail

I'd guess the pass action on this would be an upvote or No Action Needed review. Exactly. Your first thought would, preferably, been to upvote the high quality and helpful content. Comments should ...
Mokubai's user avatar
  • 94.5k
3 votes

Does this constitute a high quality question? From review audit

The question definitely does need improvement. For instance changing "I am trying to determine how to proceed." to "What are the minimum hardware requirements for Windows 11?*" ...
Ray Butterworth's user avatar
3 votes

Questionably bad answer used for audit

I'd also consider undeleting it. I disagree with this part. I've uses strikeout to indicate ink is 404 for example Instead, you could try the packages from here It links to a repository from which a ...
DavidPostill's user avatar
  • 159k
3 votes

Strange audit result

As outlined in the FAQ the criteria for "bad" Close/Reopen audits are questions which are quickly closed with no answers. AFAIK downvotes also play a role. This particular question was downvoted and ...
Dmitry Grigoryev's user avatar
3 votes
Accepted

Failing Review Audit because I added a comment that it was a duplicate post

I then added a comment recommending they search for previous questions and gave them a link to the duplicate question and answers. You should have flagged as a duplicate instead of commenting they ...
Ramhound's user avatar
  • 43.5k
2 votes

Failed audit test: "how to run the program in safe mode windows 10?"

Allow me to plagiarise myself (1): Don't worry about failing an audit or two The system is far from perfect. You're not the first to encounter this, and you won't be the last. In fact, this is the ...
bertieb's user avatar
  • 7,485
2 votes

Why are review audits so bad and are there any plans to improve them?

The downvotes so far would seem to indicate people don't like to be told they have to try harder. If you can't get an audit right, you weren't paying enough attention. Audits are a PITA, that's for ...
Tetsujin's user avatar
  • 50.1k
2 votes
Accepted

Why did I fail this review audit?

It could be improved quite a bit. The formatting could be changed to a list. Proper punctuation could be added. Proper capitalization could be added. That's an example of a low-quality answer.
Canadian Luke's user avatar
2 votes

Review audit - dissagreement

While the answer I reviewed was short, it perfectly answered the question. It was a duplicate of an existing answer. It was also deleted more than a month ago for that exact reason by a moderator. ...
Ramhound's user avatar
  • 43.5k
2 votes

Should we look up existing answers when reviewing?

It is certainly best practice. There have been many occasions when I've reviewed, particularly Late Answers, where the post merely duplicates an existing answer. Sometimes an answer from a new user ...
Chenmunka's user avatar
  • 3,228
1 vote

TIL: Answering 10 minutes after a question is asked is "late."

Now, before this review, I wouldn't have exactly considered 8 minutes and 50 seconds to be very late for an answer here. The audit system is automatic. The audit system pulls from answers and ...
Ramhound's user avatar
  • 43.5k
1 vote

TIL: Answering 10 minutes after a question is asked is "late."

The answer was posted at 16:57, then converted to a comment. Regardless... The point of the Audits are to make sure you're actually reading the questions, and looking for clues. You've done that, so ...
Canadian Luke's user avatar
1 vote

Why have the review audits not been fixed?

There is no real way that the answer you were reviewing "Looks OK". It has several red flags that, at the very least, warrant some kind of investigation or action. Firstly the formatting is awful ...
Mokubai's user avatar
  • 94.5k

Only top scored, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible