All content you post is made available under the terms of CC-BY-SA (this is part of the site's terms of service, see section 3). That means that your posts will be made available for the public to view. You do not have any control over who can view your posts.
The Stack Exchange platform does not currently provide this functionality. There is an old feature request on MSO is currently deferred, which means the team didn't explicitly say no, but also didn't see it a something that needed doing immediately.
Personally, I hope it doesn't get implemented, because I'm not sure why it's necessary...
If there is a ...
Offensive user names (and Gravatars) are something we should not tolerate, in the same way we should not do so for content of posts. "Offensive" is a little hard to pin down (different things are offensive to different people), but if you personally find something like this offensive then let us know.
Now, you can't directly flag a user for moderator ...
Are sexually explicit Gravatars allowed?
Per our Content Policy:
Sexually Explicit Material. Accounts that use Stack Exchange to post sexually explicit or pornographic material, or links to it, will be suspended.
And Terms of Service:
Subscriber […] agrees that it will not contribute any Subscriber Content that […] is offensive […]
In this case, I'...
You cannot block users from reading your questions.
The underlying issue here (and which may be why you're asking in the first place) is that you're posting questions that are either off topic, not constructive or too localised. This will often lead to them being closed as such.
Please avail yourself of the FAQ and what type of questions are suited for ...
It's not about the reputation, or at least not all about the reputation. Answering questions and building up the knowledge base is the purpose. So if you already know the answer, and you are struggling to contact original poster, I would recommend you to answer your own question on https://softwarerecs.stackexchange.com/.
You can quote the %username% of ...
Personally I would advocate removing the "please help me soon, I'm dying" comments.
The more we allow these style of comments then the more potential it has for being abused.
Instead of giving favourable treatment to the elderly/ill/soon to be deceased we should be looking to be completely neutral and fair to every user. We are not a medical support group ...
Marking an answer as accepted is purely optional and the mark is never set automatically.
A question is treated as "answered" once an answer was marked as accepted or when any other receives an upvote.
I wouldn't consider such a question fundamentally exceptional - with regards to the eventual mortality of the poster.
There's a few aspects I'd consider - I'm sorry if some of these points sound harsh, but I'd rather consider cold hard logic before emotions.
Question/Post not people
Besides the fact that the OP is terminally ill, does the post have ...
In case the image isn't clear, there are different tabs to display the criteria which the users are sorted. Stack Exchange tends to explain a lot via tool tips, so hover your mouse over the tabs and numbers and you'll know what is what.
First I'll answer your question.
1) Most questions do not require you to have points to answer. Some (protected questions) do, but many allow you to answer now. So find some questions that you know the answer to and help some people out (each upvote is worth 10 points)!
2) Ask good questions. If you ask questions that people think are worth their time, ...
Keep in mind that what follows below is just my opinion, and you may agree/disagree with parts of it. Feel free to comment or provide your own answer.
I don't think there is any way we can (or should) treat questions differently based on the user asking it, or their situation. Recall that this site's primary goal is to build a repository of knowledge in the ...
First of all, yes, mods do read question.
We usually read these questions because users flagged them.
Which mod reads which flagged question is not really regulated. Every mod can and should handle every flag.
This can lead to me reading a question on a topic I'm not fully familiar with (like when I handle a flag on a question that is tagged osx). Now when ...
In general if there are problems with members of our community, we like to intervene to fix it directly. Hiding someone is sweeping an issue under the rug and we would prefer to take a more proactive approach.
So please, flag posts and explain what the issue is and our crack moderators will assist.
I think throwing high-rep users who answer questions likely to be closed into the penalty box is too harsh, and we should not act in a manner that scares newbies away. The aggressive approach to moderation on Stack Exchange certainly has led to sites that are clean, but we also need to help users who have genuine problems. There are quite a few questions ...
You can compose an SQL query that will search the most recent data dumps. Profile information you can get is:
So from your list:
age, sex, country of origin,
Gender is not an option on profiles, and we can't force users to give to us ...
But, if I can't ignore annoying people, I am less likely to contribute at all, because why would I come back to place that annoys me, to do free work?
This is really a personality thing. One of our top contributors over the last two months left because they were annoyed by a rather small thing (maybe one particular person). This is not what we want, of ...
You can sort of infer this from
Since it's sorted by rep in that time interval, select a time interval and see how many pages it takes before you get to zero.
It's not exactly participation since you have to get an upvote (or rep some other way, like accepts or suggested edits) but it's close.
I've just on the way out, so can't be more verbose, but have a look at the full SE sites list and press "more stats" for the total number of users, and how many have moved to above 200rep in the last few weeks.
And, while you're on SE.com, have a look at the leagues - specifically the Reputation Change table on the right - as any users with a rep change ...
Most close voters do read the questions. Mods do.
It helps to try and describe the problem with words and not rely just on images which may be misleading or incomplete in delivery.
In "Turn on the Windows 8 start button like in the developer preview" you show that there is one version of the bottom left hand corner and then another image of a bottom left ...
Why does Windows think that my wireless keyboard is a toaster?
That user had a bounty on the question on that date.
What are the Windows A: and B: drives used for?
Last edit to the question
How can I remove malicious spyware, malware, adware, viruses, trojans or rootkits from my PC?
Last edit to an answer
Whether that's sensible to show, I don't know. ...
In my opinion, at least a few of his questions could be closed as off-topic if they aren't specifically asking something along the lines of "How can I change the configuration of my Captive Portal so that it can connect to iOS?".
If his question is about doing stuff on iOS to make iOS devices work with a given WiFi captive portal, that sounds like it would ...
People make mistakes.
In the former, it immediately strikes the moderator's attention that this has been asked earlier. This probably caused the moderator to defer from reading the question further and starting to look for that duplicate, in a busy or less concentrated moment stuff like this easily happens. To let the mods know they did a hiccup, I've ...