Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
@PhilipCouling, "Neither SE not I am suggesting such users be left to pollute." this is exactly what SE suggested. But they felt ashamed to share this stance in public announcement, and left it in private rooms. Moderators are effectively prohibited from taking ANY action against AI answers, unless they are breaking other policies or rules. No rule prohibits posting 6 answers in 12 minutes. What should be done to user who does this in your opinion?
@PhilipCouling, I have merely stated that only possible indicator of AI content in regards of English level is if said level is perfect. Nothing to do with culture, race, account location. Your insinuations about "those who against chatGPT answers are racially biased" same as those made by official policy announcement - are most outrages statements in regards of current situation.
"What catches a serial ChatGPT user?" How about users who come on streaks of multiple answers on unrelated topics separated by minutes? Here is an example. Should we allow such users pollute answers with senseless garbage?
"Extreme racial bias" - 1. no LLM has bad English. Perfect English with clear lack of understanding subject is usual indicator of AI answer, not the opposite. 2. Correlation does not mean causation. I doubt any mod before issuing ban or even mod message checked out where this particular user is from.
