Thanks for the answer. You have made quite a few good points, I do agree with what you have said. I think the doctor analogy works well to reflect SuperUser, and makes it clearer about the approach, from the site perspective. I know the Stack Exchange is always a great place for information, and that most google searches end up here, if the site was not administrated in the way it is, it would be like every other messy forum. I guess my sensitivity was clouding that strong moderation is key to quality content. Alas, I still think overall approach and template answers need to be modified.

I have updated my question, with the first solution that comes to mind. But I do agree it’s a difficult issue to address

Thank you very much for your answer. I do agree with what you have said and I’ll take on-board the advice given about SuperUser community moderation. I just feel that something needs to be done to appear more polite to users. I will update the question shortly to expand on my why I find it rude.

@DavidPostill I think you have misread the question this time "I have access to windows and linux, I tried bulk file renamer, but it doesn't seem to like incrementing file extentions"

@DavidPostill That is not a personal attack. There is more than one moderator, I find this with all moderators.

@DavidPostill I still think you response to that question is not in a friendly nature "No it's not. It's about the community decided standards for question quality."