@Run5k There all fixed now ;-) To be honest, I'm actually more familiar with the US spelling (even though I'm an Aussie) and had to double-check the spelling. But you're right, it is a fairly archaic word. EDIT. What would be useful would be a green squiggly line for words spelt in the alternative style to that of the dictionary in use.

@Run5k FYI, behove (UK) vs behoove (US) and an Ngram Chart of the two words. Since bertieb used both behove and realise, I would say that the post is written in UK (or Aussie, etc) style English, and your correction is incorrect ;-) Or, if you know bertieb intended to use US English, you missed fixing "realise" ;-)

Hmm, interesting. Looks like that last comment has now been deleted ;-) Still, the thread looks good. (Though nuking the whole lot is starting to look more appealing to me now.)

@JourneymanGeek Yeah! The new wording is much better than even before the previous change.

Having had another good look over the remaining comments after posting my question, I had an inkling this might have been the reason, and I can see your point. Personally, I think that if the current first two comments are deleted, the thread stands up well enough, especially with that last comment referring to the edit history. However, I'm not too fussed (now) either way.