Would this have just been better as CW?

downvote for "implied question" ... objective Q&A man, objective in your face, hi how you doin questions.

Sorry, gamification leads me to always call reputation a "score" in times like this. If you don't care about the gamification, you don't care about rep. If you care about the gamification (which you're asking for features to help show the overall gamification) then you care about rep as score. Sorry that you don't see the conflation of the two, but it exists.

But there's no score for meta's except Meta Stack Exchange right? So why would you worry about that?

You are welcome, I will keep that in mind.

@designerr000 as far as "they are given the title automatically when they have enough 'points' maybe you would like to read this section? superuser.com/about#moderators

@designerr000 when a moderator is wrong we bring the question to meta (which you have done, correctly, so thank you for doing so) and then we make a logical post which can be correctly addressed (which you seem to have done emotionally, and not as something that can be addressed directly, we are left to guess at why you are upset). Thank you for bringing your complaint to this place, now can you formulate a slightly more coherent reason as to why you are upset with the moderators, who are tasked with keeping the sites in order?

@designerr000 ~ "Users like you are who I want to block" ... who's that now? The moderators? (those are the ones with the diamonds next to their names) ~ Also, you would go a lot further by using proper grammar and the like.

"This question does not show research; it is not helpful" I think this applies here.

@Gareth just keep editing, don't stop because you were asked to stop, that's my opine.