Timeline for Question closed which regards unlicensed software, but does not condone it/ask for help with it
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2015 at 17:47 | history | edited | Giacomo1968 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 135 characters in body
|
| Oct 24, 2015 at 14:56 | comment | added | Journeyman Geek Mod | I'll welcome well explained, dissenting answers. That's the whole point of meta. I'd note that I already counted three reasons to put the question on hold including "this question is not about computer hardware or software" in the context of superuser before I touched on legality. | |
| Oct 24, 2015 at 14:45 | comment | added | einpoklum | Certainly the question (and relevant answers) do not infringe or violate the copyright. you're claiming that discussing trends in distributions of unsanctioned software - which in the US would violate Microsoft's (and others') copyrights - is breaking the TOS. I think that is an extreme and invalid intepretation. Remember that even under US law, for purposes of scholarship and research, you can even copy the actual copyrighted material itself. So, I'm certain you have taken this much too far. Also, I'm hopeful that other higher-rep users may voice different opinions. | |
| Oct 24, 2015 at 12:54 | history | answered | Journeyman GeekMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |