Skip to main content
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
Source Link

There is this answer [11] to the question How do I figure out which /dev is a USB flash drive?How do I figure out which /dev is a USB flash drive?[22] that contains an outdated answer maybe still useful for old systems.

It was proposed an edit that I try to reject because the command didn't works (different syntax), but it was accepted (see the revision [33] ).

In the comment there are different syntaxes reported ad working.

Which is the proper action to do: a rollback, an edit or both?

There is this answer [1] to the question How do I figure out which /dev is a USB flash drive?[2] that contains an outdated answer maybe still useful for old systems.

It was proposed an edit that I try to reject because the command didn't works (different syntax), but it was accepted (see the revision [3] ).

In the comment there are different syntaxes reported ad working.

Which is the proper action to do: a rollback, an edit or both?

There is this answer [1] to the question How do I figure out which /dev is a USB flash drive?[2] that contains an outdated answer maybe still useful for old systems.

It was proposed an edit that I try to reject because the command didn't works (different syntax), but it was accepted (see the revision [3] ).

In the comment there are different syntaxes reported ad working.

Which is the proper action to do: a rollback, an edit or both?

Source Link
Hastur
  • 19.3k
  • 11
  • 10

Proper behaviour: to rollback or to re-edit a not working accepted edit?

There is this answer [1] to the question How do I figure out which /dev is a USB flash drive?[2] that contains an outdated answer maybe still useful for old systems.

It was proposed an edit that I try to reject because the command didn't works (different syntax), but it was accepted (see the revision [3] ).

In the comment there are different syntaxes reported ad working.

Which is the proper action to do: a rollback, an edit or both?