Timeline for Why call It Super User?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
18 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2012 at 15:20 | history | edited | Simon Sheehan |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 25, 2012 at 14:59 | history | edited | kinokijuf |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 13, 2012 at 3:08 | history | protected | Tamara Wijsman | ||
| Feb 12, 2012 at 22:38 | answer | added | Synetech | timeline score: 2 | |
| Sep 20, 2010 at 12:37 | history | edited | Peter Mortensen | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
Using official name of the sites -see http://stackoverflow.com/legal/trademark-guidance, "Proper Use of the Stack Overflow and Stack Exchange Name".
|
| Jul 22, 2010 at 17:31 | history | migrated | from meta.stackexchange.com (revisions) | ||
| Apr 6, 2010 at 9:03 | answer | added | ConcernedOfTunbridgeWells | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jul 31, 2009 at 9:19 | answer | added | facepalmd | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jul 14, 2009 at 1:10 | answer | added | Will | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jul 13, 2009 at 22:34 | answer | added | Joe Schmoe | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jul 13, 2009 at 15:38 | comment | added | Richard | Well, bofh.com was already taken. | |
| Jul 2, 2009 at 19:06 | comment | added | AlbertoPL | heh, well they are. Just in a different way. | |
| Jul 2, 2009 at 14:54 | comment | added | Shog9 | Are you implying that superusers aren't a problem? | |
| Jul 2, 2009 at 14:35 | answer | added | TheTXI | timeline score: 16 | |
| Jul 2, 2009 at 14:34 | answer | added | gnovice | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jul 2, 2009 at 14:32 | answer | added | Michael Pryor | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jul 2, 2009 at 14:20 | answer | added | Thomas Owens | timeline score: 20 | |
| Jul 2, 2009 at 14:15 | history | asked | AlbertoPL | CC BY-SA 2.5 |