Timeline for What should we do with broken links?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Dec 31, 2015 at 16:01 | vote | accept | nKn | ||
| Dec 31, 2015 at 13:49 | comment | added | DavidPostill Mod | If the replacement is also broken then reject the edit. I would select "causes harm - replacement link also broken" | |
| Dec 31, 2015 at 13:48 | answer | added | Journeyman GeekMod | timeline score: 12 | |
| Dec 31, 2015 at 13:47 | comment | added | nKn | And what about suggested edits where we cannot confirm that the new links are analogous to the broken ones? Should we skip, reject them? | |
| Dec 31, 2015 at 13:43 | comment | added | DavidPostill Mod | It's fine to fix broken links. Just make sure you complete the edit summary to say "Fixed broken link" ;) | |
| Dec 31, 2015 at 13:37 | history | asked | nKn | CC BY-SA 3.0 |