Timeline for Super User attracting too many open-ended/subjective questions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 12, 2011 at 23:46 | comment | added | barlop | @Geoffrey Chetwood Broken link!!!! | |
Jul 22, 2010 at 17:55 | history | migrated | from meta.stackexchange.com (revisions) | ||
Jul 15, 2009 at 17:52 | comment | added | Hilarious Comedy Pesto | @Jeff: Perhaps "trash heap" is too strident. If replace it with "catch-all", you still have my general meaning. Although, to be honest, I do mean to imply a bit of negative connotation. | |
Jul 15, 2009 at 17:51 | comment | added | Geoffrey Chetwood | Indeed, superuser needs more of this: superuser.com/questions/1611 | |
Jul 15, 2009 at 17:46 | comment | added | Jonathan Sampson | Please don't make it the "trash heap." There are far too many good topics on there - I'm especially interested in items like dual-booting, networking PS3s to PCs to iTouch's, etc. I would hate to see that mixed with "How can send for operator's system cache" and the like. | |
Jul 15, 2009 at 17:39 | comment | added | Jeff Atwood | not "trash heap" but "general computer related stuff". If you think that is too general, then come up with other proposed guidelines that narrow it down to what you think it should be. This is the point of a private beta.. | |
Jul 15, 2009 at 17:35 | comment | added | TheTXI | That's what I said a couple weeks ago and Jeff Atwood didn't like that. | |
Jul 15, 2009 at 17:31 | history | answered | Hilarious Comedy Pesto | CC BY-SA 2.5 |