Timeline for Should we write information already in the tag in the body of our questions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 17, 2017 at 9:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.superuser.com/ with https://meta.superuser.com/
|
|
Mar 17, 2017 at 9:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.superuser.com/ with https://meta.superuser.com/
|
|
Jan 29, 2016 at 14:57 | comment | added | Excellll | @OliverSalzburg Care to chime in on the 64-bit question? | |
Jan 28, 2016 at 20:14 | vote | accept | Racing121 | ||
Jan 28, 2016 at 8:17 | answer | added | Hennes | timeline score: 5 | |
Jan 27, 2016 at 23:51 | answer | added | Journeyman GeekMod | timeline score: 5 | |
Jan 27, 2016 at 23:32 | comment | added | Oliver Salzburg Mod |
The tags 32-bit and 64-bit should be for questions that are specifically about the bitness of something. They shouldn't be placed on every question that uses the 32 or 64 bit version of a software.
|
|
Jan 27, 2016 at 21:35 | comment | added | Mokubai Mod | Yes, the tags are for categorisation and cataloguing, your question body should contain all relevant information . | |
Jan 27, 2016 at 21:11 | history | asked | Racing121 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |