Timeline for Correct way to handle users requesting scripts/formulae?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:04 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
|
|
| Feb 10, 2016 at 12:06 | answer | added | DMCoding | timeline score: 5 | |
| Feb 2, 2016 at 17:48 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/super_user/status/694578268570259457 | ||
| Feb 1, 2016 at 14:44 | comment | added | Excellll | Related discussion here: meta.superuser.com/q/10752/76571 | |
| Feb 1, 2016 at 13:07 | answer | added | Journeyman GeekMod | timeline score: 9 | |
| Feb 1, 2016 at 5:34 | answer | added | fixer1234 | timeline score: 17 | |
| Feb 1, 2016 at 4:26 | vote | accept | Jonno | ||
| Feb 1, 2016 at 5:42 | |||||
| Jan 31, 2016 at 20:45 | answer | added | Ben N | timeline score: 8 | |
| Jan 31, 2016 at 15:41 | comment | added | Jonno | @Ramhound This is true. Should formula questions ever be allowed? Microsoft provide very detailed and comprehensive knowledge bases on them. If not, should there be an option to close a question due to an evident lack of research? This question I answered a couple of days ago is mostly information from Microsoft, with examples and use cases, and I'm sure with enough research they would have found these formulas. I'm not quite sure where to draw the line, I suppose. | |
| Jan 31, 2016 at 14:57 | comment | added | Ramhound | If they don't know where to start, that is an indication to me, they have done very little research n the subject. | |
| Jan 31, 2016 at 10:29 | history | asked | Jonno | CC BY-SA 3.0 |