Timeline for What should I do with suggested edits to the wiki of bad tags?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:18 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
|
|
| Feb 28, 2016 at 9:26 | comment | added | fixer1234 | To answer my earlier question about retaining rep, it looks like rep for tag edits remains after the tags are deleted. Just had one like that on the manufacturer meta tags. | |
| Feb 27, 2016 at 16:25 | comment | added | bwDraco | Agreed. In my experience, @random can be rather pedantic about the "cleanliness" of the site, including things like the length of tag wiki excerpts. There is some merit in his answer, but tag wiki edits on tags that are expected to be deleted soon are not entirely useless—they can still provide useful guidance to users, including advising that the tag not be used. | |
| Feb 25, 2016 at 17:44 | comment | added | Raystafarian | @fixer1234 good question. I'll search on meta. Also link for your statement. | |
| Feb 25, 2016 at 16:43 | comment | added | fixer1234 | Similar questions have been asked about editing questions that will be deleted. In that case, the rep is lost anyway. Do you know if the rep is retained if the tag is deleted? | |
| Feb 25, 2016 at 14:20 | comment | added | Hastur | I totally agree. I just want to add that even in the case that the effort were little, this kind of rejections are a net loss for the site. To increase the quality of SU we need time. We can say that this site is built on our time and its wasting has always to be avoided. | |
| Feb 25, 2016 at 14:01 | history | answered | Raystafarian | CC BY-SA 3.0 |