Timeline for How can Community User review a edit and approve
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:04 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
|
|
| Feb 29, 2016 at 9:10 | comment | added | DavidPostill Mod | When a reviewer (2k+) improves a suggested edit then it is marked as reviewed and approved by community. "This is by design. I wanted a simple way to track all the edits that are approved through "improve", it is still easy to track who caused it, cause they are the editors of the revision directly after it. " | |
| Feb 29, 2016 at 9:07 | comment | added | DavidPostill Mod | Your answer is not very clear. Anyway this is the meta dup: Improved edit suggestions approved by Community | |
| Feb 29, 2016 at 7:42 | comment | added | Jonno | @fixer1234 It's not a bug, but a feature... ;) | |
| Feb 29, 2016 at 7:40 | comment | added | fixer1234 | Yeah. That's our story and we're sticking to it. :-) | |
| Feb 29, 2016 at 7:38 | comment | added | Jonno | @fixer1234 Yes, I've always been confused why I can't directly approve an edit. If I made it myself (And I believe if I choose to improve the edit) it'll go through instantly. Perhaps it makes sense as to prevent a quick glance over it and approving it, where you might miss something a person added incorrectly as you didn't do it yourself? | |
| Feb 29, 2016 at 7:36 | comment | added | fixer1234 | This is a strange structure. A 2K user can directly edit, but the review queue requires multiple approvals. Improving an edit is immediately approved, but it's not immediately approved if the 2K user just looks at it and decides it doesn't need further improvement. It seems like using the Community to do the approval was some kind of workaround to implement this convoluted rule. | |
| Feb 29, 2016 at 7:19 | history | answered | Jonno | CC BY-SA 3.0 |