Timeline for Add SoftwareRecommendations website to the close vote (when post belongs on other SE site)
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2016 at 19:05 | comment | added | Canadian Luke | To add, a lot of the questions I've seen I know would fall under the "crap" category in how they're written, and what's expected. I'd suggest at least cleaning up the question to meet their standard, then flagging a mod to move it | |
| Mar 3, 2016 at 15:47 | comment | added | Ramhound | What Journeyman describes is one of the reasons I don't even attempt to migrate most software recommendation questions submitted at Superuser, because at the end of the day, the quality most of the time is extremely poor. | |
| Mar 3, 2016 at 10:18 | comment | added | Dave | As always, an interesting post with good clear thoughts. Thank you :). I have no idea if most/any voters really consider quality of a question which could be migrated. I would suspect they see a question about android phones, read no more of the post and just vote to migrate. I also can't help but feel that if it's part of the SE then it's part of SE and should be an option. If we need to know about the quality before migrating posts then I hadn't realised (although I always do use common sense). If I had voted on a post which is bounced back I would hope I get informed so I can learn!... | |
| Mar 3, 2016 at 9:43 | history | answered | Journeyman GeekMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |