Skip to main content
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
Source Link

Consider:

http://superuser.com/review/low-quality-posts/536732https://superuser.com/review/low-quality-posts/536732

Why is this voted to delete?

I mean, my answer probably is not exactly what the OP was asking for, but it still fits as an answer. In a way the OP did not exactly specify and therefore it might even be helpful for future readers. Or am I wrong here about something?

Consider:

http://superuser.com/review/low-quality-posts/536732

Why is this voted to delete?

I mean, my answer probably is not exactly what the OP was asking for, but it still fits as an answer. In a way the OP did not exactly specify and therefore it might even be helpful for future readers. Or am I wrong here about something?

Consider:

https://superuser.com/review/low-quality-posts/536732

Why is this voted to delete?

I mean, my answer probably is not exactly what the OP was asking for, but it still fits as an answer. In a way the OP did not exactly specify and therefore it might even be helpful for future readers. Or am I wrong here about something?

Copy edited (but more work is needed near "voted to delete" and perhaps near "wrong here").
Source Link
Peter Mortensen
  • 12.3k
  • 16
  • 11

Why might 50% of reviewers might consider this as content that should be deleted?

http://superuser.com/review/low-quality-posts/536732 Consider:

http://superuser.com/review/low-quality-posts/536732

Why this is this voted to delete? I

I mean, my answer probably is not exactly what the OP was asking for, but it still fits as an answer, in. In a way the OP did not exactly specify and therefore it might be even be helpful for future readers. Or am I wrong here about something?

Why 50% of reviewers might consider this as content that should be deleted?

http://superuser.com/review/low-quality-posts/536732

Why this is voted to delete? I mean my answer probably is not exactly what OP was asking for, but it still fits as an answer, in a way OP did not exactly specify and therefore might be even helpful for future readers. Or am I wrong here about something?

Why might 50% of reviewers consider this as content that should be deleted?

Consider:

http://superuser.com/review/low-quality-posts/536732

Why is this voted to delete?

I mean, my answer probably is not exactly what the OP was asking for, but it still fits as an answer. In a way the OP did not exactly specify and therefore it might even be helpful for future readers. Or am I wrong here about something?

Corrected typo.
Source Link
kenorb
  • 26.2k
  • 13
  • 9

http://superuser.com/review/low-quality-posts/536732

Why this is voted to delete? I mean my answer probably is not exactly what OP was asking for BUT, but it still fits as an answer, in a way OP did not exactly specify and therefortherefore might be even helpfullhelpful for future readers. Or am I wrong here about something?

http://superuser.com/review/low-quality-posts/536732

Why this is voted to delete? I mean my answer probably is not exactly what OP was asking for BUT it still fits as an answer, in a way OP did not exactly specify and therefor might be even helpfull for future readers. Or am I wrong here about something?

http://superuser.com/review/low-quality-posts/536732

Why this is voted to delete? I mean my answer probably is not exactly what OP was asking for, but it still fits as an answer, in a way OP did not exactly specify and therefore might be even helpful for future readers. Or am I wrong here about something?

Source Link
Zaibis
  • 143
  • 3
Loading