Skip to main content
added 4 characters in body
Source Link
Ben N
  • 41.7k
  • 30
  • 56

Downvote and comment. Starting the comment with the word Danger! in bold ought to be fairly obvious, especially if the answer is sitting at a score of -1.

That said, I've never seen an answer be intentionally malicious. If a user has a pattern of doing that, a custom moderator flag would be in order. You shouldn't otherwiseOtherwise, a flag on a wrong answer; votes are what rate helpfulnessclearly malicious answer may or may not be marked helpful.

Downvote and comment. Starting the comment with the word Danger! in bold ought to be fairly obvious, especially if the answer is sitting at a score of -1.

That said, I've never seen an answer be intentionally malicious. If a user has a pattern of doing that, a custom moderator flag would be in order. You shouldn't otherwise flag a wrong answer; votes are what rate helpfulness.

Downvote and comment. Starting the comment with the word Danger! in bold ought to be fairly obvious, especially if the answer is sitting at a score of -1.

That said, I've never seen an answer be intentionally malicious. If a user has a pattern of doing that, a custom moderator flag would be in order. Otherwise, a flag on a clearly malicious answer may or may not be marked helpful.

Source Link
Ben N
  • 41.7k
  • 30
  • 56

Downvote and comment. Starting the comment with the word Danger! in bold ought to be fairly obvious, especially if the answer is sitting at a score of -1.

That said, I've never seen an answer be intentionally malicious. If a user has a pattern of doing that, a custom moderator flag would be in order. You shouldn't otherwise flag a wrong answer; votes are what rate helpfulness.