Timeline for Could we finally get rid of [software-rec]?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2020 at 13:47 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Jul 5, 2016 at 9:09 | history | edited | DavidPostillMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
| Jul 5, 2016 at 9:08 | comment | added | DavidPostill Mod | @Scott You are correct. It is 60 days. I can't remember why I thought it was 3 months :/ | |
| Jul 5, 2016 at 2:25 | comment | added | Scott - Слава Україні | @DavidPostill: Is it 3 months (or 90 days), or is it 60 days? This says 60 days. | |
| Jul 4, 2016 at 12:06 | comment | added | EKons | @DavidPostill Edited to match. I was in a rush when I posted this. | |
| Jul 4, 2016 at 12:06 | history | edited | EKons | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 205 characters in body
|
| Jul 4, 2016 at 9:34 | comment | added | DavidPostill Mod | In addition, questions can only be migrated if they're less than 3 months old. | |
| Jul 4, 2016 at 9:32 | comment | added | DavidPostill Mod | No they shouldn't. Many of them are crap and the migration will be rejected. Read What is required for a question to contain "enough information". | |
| Jul 4, 2016 at 8:27 | history | edited | EKons | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 92 characters in body
|
| Jul 4, 2016 at 8:22 | history | answered | EKons | CC BY-SA 3.0 |