Timeline for Should we edit old, non-interesting questions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:18 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
|
|
| Aug 20, 2016 at 19:55 | comment | added | fixer1234 | This is absolutely best practice, and it's what should be followed when you decide to edit an individual question or review a proposed edit. As a practical matter, it's tough, and maybe unwarranted in many cases, to do that on massive tag cleanups. I think we originally had on the order of 20,000 questions in the manufacturer meta tag cleanup. We would never get through that if we polished every single question. On questions that add value to the site, I usually try to hit obvious edits during tag cleanup, But on many, the effort would be like putting lipstick on a pig. Just sayin'. | |
| Jul 20, 2016 at 20:57 | vote | accept | Máté Juhász | ||
| Jul 18, 2016 at 0:20 | history | edited | Ben N | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 195 characters in body
|
| Jul 17, 2016 at 20:56 | history | answered | Ben N | CC BY-SA 3.0 |