Skip to main content
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
Source Link

Not the mod that deleted it but:

  • It was blatantly off-topic and should have been closed rather than answered
  • At a glance it reads a lot like LongPathTool spam, or a spam-seed for it.

It reads far too aggressively as "I must have this tool!" and from experience it feels like a spam seed. At best the question deserved closure and, given a bit of time, to be cleaned upcleaned up.

Either way though I'm disinclined to undelete the question as it would still be close worthy, and I don't see any way it could be made on-topic. All they want is the software, not the help.

Not the mod that deleted it but:

  • It was blatantly off-topic and should have been closed rather than answered
  • At a glance it reads a lot like LongPathTool spam, or a spam-seed for it.

It reads far too aggressively as "I must have this tool!" and from experience it feels like a spam seed. At best the question deserved closure and, given a bit of time, to be cleaned up.

Either way though I'm disinclined to undelete the question as it would still be close worthy, and I don't see any way it could be made on-topic. All they want is the software, not the help.

Not the mod that deleted it but:

  • It was blatantly off-topic and should have been closed rather than answered
  • At a glance it reads a lot like LongPathTool spam, or a spam-seed for it.

It reads far too aggressively as "I must have this tool!" and from experience it feels like a spam seed. At best the question deserved closure and, given a bit of time, to be cleaned up.

Either way though I'm disinclined to undelete the question as it would still be close worthy, and I don't see any way it could be made on-topic. All they want is the software, not the help.

Source Link
Mokubai Mod
  • 94.8k
  • 1
  • 53
  • 78

Not the mod that deleted it but:

  • It was blatantly off-topic and should have been closed rather than answered
  • At a glance it reads a lot like LongPathTool spam, or a spam-seed for it.

It reads far too aggressively as "I must have this tool!" and from experience it feels like a spam seed. At best the question deserved closure and, given a bit of time, to be cleaned up.

Either way though I'm disinclined to undelete the question as it would still be close worthy, and I don't see any way it could be made on-topic. All they want is the software, not the help.