Timeline for Advice for editing question so problem more clearly stated
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:04 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
|
|
| Mar 2, 2017 at 6:29 | comment | added | Palaeologus | Great, thanks for the advice. The response to that other question came across as a little...blunt, so I wasn't sure if I was in the wrong or not. | |
| Mar 2, 2017 at 5:54 | comment | added | fixer1234 | No need for further edits. If it wasn't closed as a duplicate, you could add and accept an answer to formally document it and close the loop on the question. You wondered whether another thread applied to your situation. Rather than keep two separate threads, one just to say that the other applies, the two were linked and a clarification provided in a comment. Anyone landing on your question will see the link to where the solutions are, and the clarification that they do apply. So everything's good as is. | |
| Mar 2, 2017 at 4:27 | history | edited | Palaeologus | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
changed title for clarity
|
| Mar 2, 2017 at 4:18 | history | asked | Palaeologus | CC BY-SA 3.0 |