Timeline for A useful question was put on hold after six years due to software recommentation, how to respond?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2017 at 1:26 | answer | added | James Mertz | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jul 19, 2017 at 17:18 | comment | added | Jason C | Btw in general it's not a problem that it's on hold. It doesn't make it more difficult to find, or make it go away, or anything like that. The biggest effect is it just prevents new answers, which is usually the right thing to do anyways. So, there really isn't much issue with things like this. | |
| Jul 9, 2017 at 18:31 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/super_user/status/884117859722420224 | ||
| Jul 7, 2017 at 23:11 | comment | added | fixer1234 | There are lots of questions that are off-topic, at least as written, that weren't previously closed. Early in the site's history, there was less rigorous community moderation, and a lot of stuff slipped through. As long as it's quietly buried on the site, it isn't worth the massive effort that would be needed to ferret it all out. However, it gets attention if it gets bumped to the main page through an edit or answer. | |
| Jul 6, 2017 at 10:19 | vote | accept | starfry | ||
| Jul 6, 2017 at 9:28 | answer | added | DavidPostillMod | timeline score: 18 | |
| Jul 6, 2017 at 9:08 | history | asked | starfry | CC BY-SA 3.0 |