Timeline for This audit is ridiculous! [duplicate]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
21 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2017 at 2:29 | comment | added | Ramhound | @AntonKrouglov Most questions are closed by the community not the moderators and the fact you don't know that (or believe otherwise) indicates how more you have to learn. | |
| Aug 20, 2017 at 6:27 | history | duplicates list edited | MokubaiMod | duplicates list edited from Bad audit question - failed audit on question that should have been closed to Invalid review question? Can it be removed from the audit queue?, Does this audit make sense?, Bad audit question - failed audit on question that should have been closed, Mechanism for scrapping bad audit questions?, Bad review audit question? | |
| Aug 20, 2017 at 6:25 | history | closed | MokubaiMod | Duplicate of Bad audit question - failed audit on question that should have been closed | |
| Aug 18, 2017 at 18:49 | comment | added | Scott - Слава Україні | @Mathieu K.: Thanks for the rhyme. As to “our values”: Stack Exchange hates fun! | |
| Aug 18, 2017 at 15:18 | comment | added | Mathieu K. | @BrandonIbbotson, same here. In Canada, it was a little lilting rhyme: Stop, look, and listen // before you cross the street. // Use your eyes, use your ears // before you use your feet. --or something of the sort. Here I'd say we're being cute at the expense of clarity. Whether that's desirable depends on our values. | |
| Aug 17, 2017 at 7:34 | comment | added | John Stoneman | @MikeChamberlain, I tried editing the post, but you can't just remove the question mark, since you need to change at least six characters, so you get the message: "Edits must be at least 6 characters; is there something else to improve in this post?" | |
| Aug 16, 2017 at 14:33 | comment | added | byxor | "STOP! Look and Listen" is what I was taught to do (in school in the UK) when crossing roads. It essentially meant: "slow down and act carefully before doing something". I think the message is just a spin on that road-crossing tip. | |
| Aug 16, 2017 at 11:56 | comment | added | Anton Krouglov | Well, as just a user I feel this is like a revenge to those mods who close valid questions so quickly and not paying attention to the details. | |
| Aug 15, 2017 at 14:22 | history | edited | Excellll | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
removed brackets in title -- it looked like a tag cleanup request
|
| Aug 14, 2017 at 8:18 | comment | added | michael | The auto-critique was constructive and imo deserved. Hopefully one of these repeated moments can be taken as instructive, if not from the bot, then from these more nuanced human comments. Don't take offense from either. Helping to build (editing & improving) is harder than tearing down (e.g. closing), and requires a human touch & heart. | |
| Aug 13, 2017 at 22:01 | history | edited | DavidPostillMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body; edited title
|
| Aug 11, 2017 at 0:35 | comment | added | I say Reinstate Monica | @xenoid I don't believe it to be so much luck as choosing to accept the constructive criticism of a deserved audit failure. Every audit I've failed (that wasn't audit-bot's mistake) has helped me learn how to be a better reviewer. | |
| Aug 11, 2017 at 0:05 | comment | added | Mike Chamberlain | You would rather close a fairly decent question for sub-optimal use of punctuation than spend the 5 seconds needed to improve it? | |
| Aug 10, 2017 at 22:20 | comment | added | xenoid | @twisty most of those I failed helpfully educated me. You are lucky person. So far for me its either We agree that we disagree or where is that "I don't understand" button? | |
| Aug 10, 2017 at 3:09 | comment | added | Scott - Слава Україні | But, phrased the way it is? With a declarative sentence with a question mark at the end? Besides, different sites have different rules. Maybe they’re OK with opinion-based questions; we aren’t. | |
| Aug 10, 2017 at 3:05 | comment | added | david25272 | It's considered a pertinent enough question to be included in the TOR FAQ. | |
| Aug 9, 2017 at 8:48 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/super_user/status/895205079766237184 | ||
| Aug 8, 2017 at 15:58 | comment | added | I say Reinstate Monica | "...review audits are ridiculous"... when they don't work as intended. I've also failed equally ridiculous audits, but most of those I failed helpfully educated me. Like with e-mail spam filters, we waste our time complaining about the automated audit system's occasional false positive screw up. | |
| Aug 8, 2017 at 4:17 | comment | added | Scott - Слава Україні | You might as well close this as a duplicate, e.g., of this, this, this, this, this, or this. I just wanted to add it to the pantheon of evidence that the review audits are ridiculous. | |
| Aug 8, 2017 at 4:17 | comment | added | Scott - Слава Україні | Don’t worry; I’m not worried about being review banned. I have over 14000 reviews on Super User, and this is my first audit failure in a while. | |
| Aug 8, 2017 at 4:17 | history | asked | Scott - Слава Україні | CC BY-SA 3.0 |