Timeline for Why has this question been downvoted?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2017 at 22:04 | vote | accept | Hashim Aziz | ||
| Sep 4, 2017 at 16:02 | history | edited | randomMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Sep 4, 2017 at 0:05 | comment | added | random Mod | No, the default is no votes. It's not to expect to get upvotes just because | |
| Sep 3, 2017 at 3:25 | comment | added | Ramhound | You assume people agree your question is well-put or it was well researched. It could be the subtle hostility, "How do I disable this intrusive default behaviour?", in your question itself. Take your pick. As for not providing a comment, people who review posts frequently, can recall past reactions users have had to feedback. Three of your four questions here at meta.superuse have extremely negative tones to them, all three of them, have tones and statements that indicate there is nothing that can be improved to raise the quality of your questions. You wanted feedback, it's been provided | |
| Sep 3, 2017 at 0:26 | answer | added | Journeyman GeekMod | timeline score: 6 | |
| Sep 3, 2017 at 0:25 | comment | added | Hashim Aziz | @random - Because there's no valid reason to downvote it, and that's how SE works; a valid, well-put question should attract no downvotes. The only thing I can think of is that it was done out of spite but maybe it was a genuine mistake or someone had a bad day. Either way, it shouldn't become normality to expect downvotes on valid questions, as you seem to be implying that it should be. | |
| Sep 3, 2017 at 0:20 | comment | added | random Mod | Why do you just expect upvotes? | |
| Sep 2, 2017 at 22:28 | comment | added | DavidPostill Mod | I can't see anything wrong with your question. | |
| Sep 2, 2017 at 22:27 | comment | added | DavidPostill Mod | Tim Post lost his keys again. | |
| Sep 2, 2017 at 22:06 | history | asked | Hashim Aziz | CC BY-SA 3.0 |