Timeline for Useful tag edits rejected
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2018 at 8:03 | answer | added | Scott - Слава Україні | timeline score: 4 | |
| Oct 1, 2018 at 15:04 | vote | accept | Dessa Simpson | ||
| Oct 1, 2018 at 1:37 | answer | added | fixer1234 | timeline score: 4 | |
| Sep 28, 2018 at 22:11 | comment | added | Dessa Simpson | @Ramhound After over two weeks, there were no objections, and the tag had already been listed in the larger overall meta thread, so I decided to begin retagging. Is there something else I should have done? See link in above comment for the question. | |
| Sep 28, 2018 at 22:07 | comment | added | Ramhound | Retagging should be done after the community agreement, no idea how many questions you edited at once, but those three are unanswered and a tag won’t chnage that fact. But my feelings on the tag, are for that question, not this one. | |
| Sep 28, 2018 at 22:03 | comment | added | Dessa Simpson | @Ramhound I was working through the Mikrotik questions with the specific purpose of retagging them, to get rid of the Mikrotik tag. The third one seems to me to be a well-formed question, but I felt it would benefit from the freepbx tag. | |
| Sep 28, 2018 at 22:01 | comment | added | Ramhound | All three were 45-60 days old. None of those questions could have been improved, to encourage somebody to answer them, instead of just bumping a 2 month old question to the front page? | |
| Sep 28, 2018 at 21:58 | comment | added | Dessa Simpson | @Ramhound I'm not sure I fully understand what you're trying to say, but allow me to clarify one point: I am not contesting those instances. The only ones I disagree with are those listed. | |
| Sep 28, 2018 at 21:56 | comment | added | Ramhound | “I'll freely admit that in a couple cases I was overzealous and added the tag where it was tangentially relevant” - Sounds like if those were rejected, they should have been rejected, should have linked to the meta post since an edit commentary is limited. Tag has no usage guidelines, the tag should be perfect, before the entire community bumps older questions to the front page | |
| Sep 28, 2018 at 16:03 | comment | added | Dessa Simpson | @Burgi Also, I did create the post; I just didn't reference it. It doesn't seem relevant for non-retags: meta.superuser.com/q/13309/341338 | |
| Sep 28, 2018 at 16:02 | comment | added | Dessa Simpson | @Burgi That would make sense if the retags were rejected, but these are added tags. There was previously no Mikrotik-related tag on these questions. | |
| Sep 28, 2018 at 15:59 | comment | added | Burgi | You possibly should have created a [MSU] post explaining your plans before embarking on the changes. You then reference the post in your edit description. | |
| Sep 28, 2018 at 15:49 | history | asked | Dessa Simpson | CC BY-SA 4.0 |