Timeline for Why did my edit that fixed several spelling errors get rejected as superfluous?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2019 at 15:38 | answer | added | Excellll | timeline score: 13 | |
| Apr 3, 2019 at 8:51 | comment | added | bertieb | @Kaz Though modesty may prevent them from pointing it out, Run5k is the top edit queue reviewer, who frequently and politely discusses both edits and how they are reviewed. My decision was deliberate as explained in my answer. | |
| Apr 3, 2019 at 7:18 | comment | added | Kaz | This just looks like a random screwup. Just two people happened to vote the wrong way, and poof. Maybe they were reviewing many items in a queue, just spent a second on this and called it the wrong way. | |
| Apr 1, 2019 at 21:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/super_user/status/1112822068826066944 | ||
| Apr 1, 2019 at 20:44 | answer | added | Scott - Слава Україні | timeline score: 24 | |
| Apr 1, 2019 at 13:54 | comment | added | Run5k | @bertieb already authored a perfect summary of my thought process. Please, don't get me wrong: we truly appreciate your time and effort! However, this particular effort wasn't quite ideal, as described below. | |
| Mar 31, 2019 at 22:28 | vote | accept | timotree | ||
| Apr 9, 2019 at 20:41 | |||||
| Mar 31, 2019 at 22:26 | comment | added | bertieb | Thanks for asking about this on Meta. I have given my reasoning for rejecting, which I hope makes sense. @Run5k may also chime in with their thoughts as the other reviewer in this instance. | |
| Mar 31, 2019 at 22:23 | answer | added | bertieb | timeline score: -1 | |
| Mar 31, 2019 at 21:04 | history | asked | timotree | CC BY-SA 4.0 |