Timeline for Should we edit out potentially inappropriate content if they might be an important part of a question?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aug 14, 2019 at 21:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/super_user/status/1161744437900455937 | ||
Aug 14, 2019 at 15:17 | comment | added | WBT | example.com is a much better choice than mycompany.com; it's explicitly reserved for such purposes. | |
Aug 6, 2019 at 9:34 | comment | added | TRiG | Whatever you do, mycompany.com is not appropriate. I spend enough of my time editing that kind of domain out and replacing them with RFC 2606 domains. | |
Aug 5, 2019 at 17:04 | comment | added | JW0914 | Perspective is everything... "Dick" is a common nickname for Richard, such as Richard "Dick" Nixon (aka Tricky Dicky). Similarly, "bitch" is still utilized to refer to female dogs; "pussy" is still utilized as a name for cats, as well as by at least two bands, Pussy Riot and The Pussycat Dolls; etc. There are definitely inappropriate words that should be edited out, but before doing so we should ask ourselves whether the word could be being utilized appropriately. | |
Aug 2, 2019 at 15:18 | vote | accept | Vylix | ||
Aug 2, 2019 at 0:46 | answer | added | Journeyman GeekMod | timeline score: 11 | |
Aug 1, 2019 at 19:30 | comment | added | fixer1234 | I suspect Dr. Dickhopper would be quite offended by your observation. :-) | |
Aug 1, 2019 at 16:40 | comment | added | Ramhound | The two words that make up that domain are legitimate English words. Only when used to reference a body part is one of those words inappropriate. You raise the real question, if the question is legitimate or not, which I suspect is indeed not legitimate. | |
Aug 1, 2019 at 15:53 | history | asked | Vylix | CC BY-SA 4.0 |