Timeline for Should a question be closed if the asker mentions they might end up using other software?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2019 at 12:43 | comment | added | I say Reinstate Monica | Very good. It's helpful to keep in mind we want our posts to edify future visitors who may have the same question and might be less familiar with these things. | |
| Aug 9, 2019 at 12:42 | history | edited | bertieb | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
add short paragraph on SAQ (cheers Twisty)
|
| Aug 9, 2019 at 12:40 | comment | added | bertieb | @TwistyImpersonator fair point, I considered while writing but elided at the time- OP should be familiar with self-answers (and if knew the answer, should have done so!) but I'll add something which addresses that now | |
| Aug 9, 2019 at 12:34 | comment | added | I say Reinstate Monica | Perhaps the criterion, "indicated they had some knowledge of the answer they posted the question about" would be better if amended to include the condition, "and they didn't post a self-answer." Otherwise this seems to suggest there's an issue merely in the case the OP knows the answer, but we do actually want this in cases of self-answered questions. | |
| Aug 9, 2019 at 12:23 | comment | added | bertieb | @Ramhound huh, I missed that comment- thankfully its gone, had I seen it I would have flagged it for removal | |
| Aug 9, 2019 at 12:21 | history | edited | bertieb | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
expand first section, make title clearer
|
| Aug 9, 2019 at 12:19 | comment | added | Ramhound | It didn't garner more close votes due to the fact, the author showed such disrespect towards me after asking if I worked for EaseUS, I decided it was easier to answer their question. | |
| Aug 9, 2019 at 12:17 | history | edited | bertieb | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
expand first section, make title clearer
|
| Aug 9, 2019 at 12:10 | history | answered | bertieb | CC BY-SA 4.0 |