Timeline for It happened again: My question has been closed inadvertently
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2020 at 21:43 | history | edited | Ramhound | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 11 characters in body
|
| Jan 5, 2020 at 10:06 | history | edited | Ramhound | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 555 characters in body
|
| Jan 5, 2020 at 9:22 | comment | added | Binarus | Perhaps other will read the comments and learn from the discussion (as I do), so: Questions asking the reason a manufacturer has made something incompatible or compatible is impossible to answer. It seems were are getting closer to the problem now. There is a severe misunderstanding. Of course, I am absolutely not interested in why Supermicro decided to make them incompatible. My why was meant in the technical sense. I was hoping for an answer like, for example, "because the screw holes in the mainboard do not match the standoff holes in that case". I'll clarify my question again. | |
| Jan 5, 2020 at 8:41 | comment | added | Ramhound | I will not be reading any commentary to this answer. You seem to have wanted an explanation on the reason your question was closed. I have tried to explain calmly in clear language my reason for my own vote to close the question. I also hinted at the reason I personally won’t vote to reopen the question in its current form. | |
| Jan 5, 2020 at 8:36 | history | answered | Ramhound | CC BY-SA 4.0 |