Timeline for (Robo-review) Can my edit please be approved?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2020 at 12:12 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Mar 31, 2020 at 11:39 | answer | added | Ramhound | timeline score: 4 | |
| Mar 31, 2020 at 11:35 | comment | added | Ramhound | The edit seems trivial and specifically goes against the intent of the author’s original question. No; We are not going to overwrite the author in a case like this. Your edit doesn’t improve the quality of the quest. | |
| Mar 31, 2020 at 9:06 | comment | added | Mokubai Mod | "The question is quite old and has been closed a long time ago" and "edits will NOT push the post into the queue" so what exactly is the point of editing it in the first place if not to bring it to a state where it can be reopened? | |
| Mar 31, 2020 at 8:59 | comment | added | Mokubai Mod | 1) it obviously wasn't a "robo-review" as the reject reason is custom and OP took the time to write it. Robo reviews are generally accepting everything regardless. This is definitely not that. 2) what is the point in editing a closed question? Why does it need to be corrected? Are there better places to spend your time on than closed questions? OP doesn't want it edited in that way, so why do we need to force it for the sake of one small number difference and a spelling error? | |
| Mar 31, 2020 at 8:32 | history | asked | user1136553 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |