Timeline for Suggested edit about Windows XP and Vista laptops' first and "second" warnings about low battery power has been rejected
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2020 at 13:47 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Apr 27, 2020 at 10:12 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Apr 27, 2020 at 10:12 | answer | added | user1136553 | timeline score: -2 | |
| Apr 15, 2020 at 6:53 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Apr 27, 2020 at 10:12 | |||||
| Apr 14, 2020 at 17:12 | history | edited | MokubaiMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Apr 14, 2020 at 17:11 | comment | added | Mokubai Mod |
If they DO issue the second warning, then can my edit please be approved? It is not our job to verify if your edit is correct. If you cannot guarantee your edit is valid then you shouldn't be submitting an edit in the first place. If you want us to override an edit rejection then it shouldn't be conditional on us first going out to install all the offending (offensive?) operating systems that might exhibit a particular behaviour.
|
|
| Apr 14, 2020 at 16:46 | answer | added | Ramhound | timeline score: 3 | |
| Apr 14, 2020 at 14:24 | comment | added | Ramhound | I stand by my decision that the edit introduces grammatical edits that are superfluous. The current statement and what you want to edit it to are saying the same exact thing. If you are trying to say there are three warnings, then you have introduced a grammatical error, and that is a reason to reject the edit proposal. I don't believe your edit clarifies the author's statement, in fact I would argue, your edit makes it less clear. | |
| Apr 14, 2020 at 13:50 | history | asked | user1136553 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |