Return to Answer

1. Which partition-table type would serve my purposes better: MBR or GPT?

2. Which cluster size do I choose?

3. Which file system would serve my purposes better: exFAT or NTFS?

4. Do I leave it at "standard", whatever this might mean, or is something else more appropriate?

5. How important are the above tradeoffs for the stated purposes?

6. Are there more points that are relevant for the stated purposes?

1. Which partition-table type would serve my purposes better: MBR or GPT?

2. Which cluster size do I choose?

3. Which file system would serve my purposes better: exFAT or NTFS?

4. Do I leave it at "standard", whatever this might mean, or is something else more appropriate?

5. How important are the above tradeoffs for the stated purposes?

6. Are there more points that are relevant for the stated purposes?

I would like to point out there hasn’t been an actual new file released in more than a decade. Even if one has been released it isn’t natively supported by Windows.

I would like to point out there hasn’t been an actual new file system released in more than a decade. Even if one has been released it isn’t natively supported by Windows.

Therefore, I kindly ask to vote for reopening the question.

Your answer is inconsistent. After you tried to insult my intelligence by saying that better and best are the same in English and wished me a good day, I don't have to continue this discussion

I respectfully disagree that my answer is inconsistent. It certainly wasn't my intention to insult your intelligence, when I indicated that a question that uses the word "better" or "best", are virtually identical in my opinion. While it's understandable you are upset about the closure of your question, it seems based on the tone of your most recent comments, you are not assuming I have the best intentions. I am not the first person within the community you have become noticeable upset with.

Therefore, I kindly ask to vote for reopening the question.