Timeline for Downvote for a working answer, only because it means too much effort compared to available answers?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2020 at 6:35 | comment | added | questionto42 | The answer is not only upvoted and accepted for the details and the criticism that it is repeating another answer, but also for the accepted answer to the general question: "Is there a kind of rule to post only those answers which offer a solution with a needed time investment that is in good proportion with already available answers?" "What you describe absolutely is not a community rule." --> This is the accepted answer of the general question. | |
| Jul 28, 2020 at 6:24 | vote | accept | questionto42 | ||
| Jul 28, 2020 at 6:23 | comment | added | questionto42 | Now that I see that my answer was completely redundant - there was an accepted answer with exactly the same idea suggested and which you rightly found out, good you saw this - I see a clear reason of course to downvote this, and it is of course deleted. I must have been confused by the three opened questions in parallel, of course I would not post an answer that is exactly the same as the accepted answer. | |
| Jul 28, 2020 at 6:21 | comment | added | questionto42 | Keeping the things separate now (I have deleted the answer and you were right). Mentioning the links to Windows 10 answers was just a reference to support statements about the registry which is nothing I knew myself. I was aware that I was refering to Windows 10 in an old Windows 7 thread. I simply wanted to complete the ideas in all 3 questions. I also wanted to flag the one Windows 10 answer as duplicate, but that was not possible as it had no accepted answer. These were my first posts on this SE, and I just wanted to add the idea where it did not exist yet. Upvote for all your details. | |
| Jul 28, 2020 at 1:40 | history | edited | Ramhound | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 910 characters in body
|
| Jul 27, 2020 at 21:14 | history | edited | Ramhound | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 203 characters in body
|
| Jul 27, 2020 at 21:06 | history | edited | Ramhound | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 550 characters in body
|
| Jul 27, 2020 at 20:59 | history | answered | Ramhound | CC BY-SA 4.0 |