From the comments, @DavidPostill reopened the question. The reason given for it being "unclear" was that there was no information on where the "record" referenced in the question came from (e.g. a flat file or a database). However, this is why I recommend again voting-to-close questions without having expertise in the area being discussed (especially the Mod closer-hammer).

Nushell users would recognize that the record in the question was simply a Nushell "record literal" (to use the programming term). It didn't have (or need) a source. It was just a simple record, entered at the command-line, designed to make the question easy to understand. Ultimately, it apparently had the reverses effect :-/.

From the comments, @DavidPostill reopened the question. The reason given for it being "unclear" was that there was no information on where the "record" referenced in the question came from (e.g. a flat file or a database). However, this is why I recommend again voting-to-close questions without having expertise in the area being discussed (especially the Mod close-hammer).

Nushell users would recognize that the record in the question was simply a Nushell "record literal" (to use the programming term). It didn't have (or need) a source. It was just a simple record, entered at the command-line, designed to make the question easy to understand. Ultimately, it apparently had the reverse effect :-/.