its good to organise and maintain the forum and make it look good and have sensful question or reserarch or knowledge sharing.

Super User isn’t a discussion forum. Discussions are specifically frowned upon.

As in stack exchange specially super user i have faced strict rules of closing question on asking queries and asking more questions in one post is CRIME.

One of the reasons a question asking multiple questions is frowned upon, and likely to get the question closed, is that a question asking multiple questions not considered to be focused.

What if i post 10 post with same category questions and ask simple poitns in another 10 parts.

You should only ask 10 questions, if you can insure that those multiple questions, will be highly detailed independent questions. If you are referencing previous questions your question likely will NOT be well received.

And on above in super user forum why just we may get our questions closed and even banned to ask more question why such rules.

Question bans are a feature of Stack Exchange. Every community is independent in that regard. If your questions in one community are not well reviewed you should take the feedback you have received and improve them. Ask 10 questions, 15 minutes apart, is one way many users get themselves in trouble. It’s impossible to write 10 high quality independent questions, address the feedback on those questions, and constantly improve that amount of questions.

As a new user or member types the hard work and gives time to create new question and anxious to know answer may be he or she cant explain the way the expert can understand as experts are more experienced and old in forums and new users are just new borned novice users of stack exchange and experts should guide or edit themself or super users should have editors who should edit the questions to make more focused readabale and explainible to technical experts.

If you have received a downvote to your contributions, it absolutely is not due to the fact, a user was “bored”.

I know some experts feel it unnecessary because they think it’s not useful for their research but it can be useful for other experts. Every question and answering results in new invention and new ideas we should welcome them.

Here is a reality check, not every question that is asked, is actually helpful to the community or even within scope.

its good to organise and maintain the forum and make it look good and have sensful question or reserarch or knowledge sharing.

Super User isn’t a discussion forum. Discussions are specifically frowned upon.

As in stack exchange specially super user i have faced strict rules of closing question on asking queries and asking more questions in one post is CRIME.

One of the reasons a question asking multiple questions is frowned upon, and likely to get the question closed, is that a question asking multiple questions is not considered to be focused. Questions that are unfocused are often very difficult to answer and often an indication the actual problem the user is experiencing hasn’t been properly identified

What if i post 10 post with same category questions and ask simple poitns in another 10 parts.

You should only ask 10 questions, if you can insure that those multiple questions, will be highly detailed independent questions. If you are referencing previous questions your question likely will NOT be well received.

And on above in super user forum why just we may get our questions closed and even banned to ask more question why such rules.

Question bans are a feature of Stack Exchange. Every community is independent in that regard. If your questions in one community are not well reviewed you should take the feedback you have received and improve them. Ask 10 questions, 15 minutes apart, is one way many users get themselves in trouble. It’s impossible to write 10 high quality independent questions, address the feedback on those questions, and constantly improve that amount of questions.

As a new user or member types the hard work and gives time to create new question and anxious to know answer may be he or she cant explain the way the expert can understand as experts are more experienced and old in forums and new users are just new borned novice users of stack exchange and experts should guide or edit themself or super users should have editors who should edit the questions to make more focused readabale and explainible to technical experts.

If you have received a downvote to your contributions, it absolutely is not due to the fact, a user was “bored”.

I know some experts feel it unnecessary because they think it’s not useful for their research but it can be useful for other experts. Every question and answering results in new invention and new ideas we should welcome them.

Here is a reality check, not every question that is asked, is actually helpful to the community or even within scope.