Timeline for Why are review audits so bad and are there any plans to improve them?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2023 at 7:47 | history | edited | Tetsujin | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 173 characters in body
|
| Aug 21, 2023 at 12:16 | comment | added | Tetsujin | It's basically three examples of the same thing - what the bot does to generate obvious audits in Suggested Edits. Still covered by paragraph two. And now made more blindingly obvious in paragraph three. | |
| Aug 21, 2023 at 12:15 | history | edited | Tetsujin | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 172 characters in body
|
| Aug 21, 2023 at 11:43 | comment | added | Destroy666 | If you think examples for one of the points that were brought up are "noise" then it further confirms what I wrote above. The examples shouldn't have been needed in ideal case scenario of people answering in meta actually doing reviews in mentioned queues. Even then they provide value to newcomers not knowing what I'm talking about, though. I'm downvoting this now as it's very generic reply about reviews that attempts to answer "Why are reviews too hard?" rather than "Why are reviews so bad?", which is partially opposite to few of my included bullet points. | |
| Aug 21, 2023 at 11:33 | comment | added | Tetsujin | I read the original question, before you filled it with noise. It's covered in my second paragraph. | |
| Aug 21, 2023 at 11:31 | comment | added | Destroy666 | This doesn't touch on anything specified in the question, which I'd recommend reading before answering. | |
| Aug 21, 2023 at 10:44 | history | answered | Tetsujin | CC BY-SA 4.0 |