Timeline for Rename microsoft-one-outlook to outlook-for-windows
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 2023 at 20:05 | answer | added | MokubaiMod | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 26, 2023 at 10:44 | comment | added | Ramhound | @LWC - I have a massive distrust with Wikipedia as an organization. I will never become a Wikipedia editor | |
| Nov 26, 2023 at 8:39 | comment | added | LWC | Maybe consider fixing there, preferably with sources? | |
| Nov 26, 2023 at 3:11 | comment | added | Ramhound | @LWC - Wikipedia is community generated. Based on my interpretation of the article there are numerous inaccuracies contained within it. At this time One Outlook and Outlook for Windows are two different efforts. “One Outlook” is the codename of the effort to unify Windows Mail and Outlook into a single offering. My opinion the One Outlook tag should just be burned and eventually deleted. | |
| Nov 26, 2023 at 1:08 | comment | added | Mokubai Mod | It seems that "one outlook" might be their project codename: codetwo.com/admins-blog/new-outlook-for-windows | |
| Nov 26, 2023 at 1:02 | comment | added | LWC | This is quite confusing as the Wikipedia article states Outlook for Windows is also referred to as New Outlook and Outlook (new). | |
| Nov 25, 2023 at 22:35 | comment | added | Mokubai Mod | It seems to refer to the "new and improved" New Outlook For Windows, as opposed to the "old" Outlook for Windows which actually has features that work and are used in businesses. I suspect "One Outlook" is a failed moniker that marketing tried to get to stick because it is the "One Outlook you need (that lacks the features you actually want)". I get the impression that Microsoft are pressing ahead with their idiotic packaging of web applications as desktop applications in the name of "unified experiences" and in so doing are removing all useful or unique features. | |
| Nov 25, 2023 at 21:27 | history | asked | LWC | CC BY-SA 4.0 |