Timeline for Requesting clarity on edits that update redirecting URLs
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 10 at 15:37 | vote | accept | AJM | ||
| May 10 at 14:57 | comment | added | Journeyman Geek Mod | Honestly there's no rep involved. - so up you. I'm just mildly annoyed I can't go "gimme a list of links, I'll sort it for you". I mostly am on meta to sort things out and be helpful :D | |
| May 10 at 14:51 | comment | added | AJM | Oh, and one more thing... WE HAIL GRUMPY CAT! HAIL, HAIL, GRUMPY CAT! | |
| May 10 at 14:51 | comment | added | AJM | Thanks. I normally use phrasing like "Updated redirecting URL" for the edit summaries, and that's what I did this time. Maybe in future I'll try something like "URL redirects, so updated to the current URL to ensure the link stays valid". I'm not an expert on meta, so is there any reason to hold off clicking the green tick here? | |
| May 10 at 14:45 | history | answered | Journeyman GeekMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |