Timeline for Please don't turn new user's questions into audit tests
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 4 at 6:25 | comment | added | Dominique | @Robotnik: I only have one problem with your action: as it's my own question, I can't upvote it :-) Thanks a lot. | |
| Jul 3 at 23:47 | comment | added | Robotnik | @Dominique - hey, I've taken a stab at rewriting your question with the additional information you shared in various comments, I hope that's ok. If not, please feel free to edit it further, or even rollback if it's not needed :) | |
| Jul 3 at 23:46 | history | edited | Robotnik | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
rewrite to what is actually requested, with additional information from comments
|
| Jul 3 at 13:40 | comment | added | Engineer Toast | You have 5 questions on SU Meta and 4 of them are about audit tests. Maybe start by reading how review queues are supposed to be managed, especially the First Questions queue. | |
| Jul 3 at 3:48 | comment | added | Ramhound | Plenty of new users ask good questions, that are excellent audit questions, and low quality questions make splendid audit questions because far to many users think low quality questions are helpful and don’t downvote them | |
| Jul 1 at 16:37 | answer | added | bertieb | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jul 1 at 14:51 | comment | added | Dominique | Let's agree to disagree. :-) | |
| Jul 1 at 14:50 | comment | added | Mokubai Mod | I disagree, they're exactly the kind of questions you want as reviews exactly because their quality is highly variable. They are the perfect source of reviews, as shown in this case. | |
| Jul 1 at 14:48 | comment | added | Dominique | @Mokubai: we're getting off track here: my feature request is not to turn new users' questions into audit tests, because new users generally don't have the experience of asking good questions. | |
| Jul 1 at 14:44 | comment | added | Mokubai Mod | If that's how you're using the review queues then you're shooting yourself in the foot without even paying attention. It sounds to me like you're basically robo reviewing and coming back after the fact to say "whoopsie, I should have done something". Pay attention the first time you see it and take action then, don't leave it for later. | |
| Jul 1 at 14:41 | comment | added | Dominique | Just read my comments on your colleague's answer (especially my third comment) and you'll see my point :-) | |
| Jul 1 at 14:39 | comment | added | Mokubai Mod | Nope. That question was pretty far from "Looks OK" and was a good audit IMO. You could have commented that more information was needed, downvoted, voted to close, flagged or done anything but click "Looks OK". This is one audit that you legitimately failed. | |
| Jul 1 at 14:31 | history | edited | Dominique | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
I started as a discussion, but then I realised my question can be a feature request: only make audit tests of questions from higher reputation.
|
| Jul 1 at 14:17 | answer | added | Journeyman GeekMod | timeline score: 8 | |
| Jul 1 at 13:28 | history | asked | Dominique | CC BY-SA 4.0 |