Timeline for Should the [ps1] tag be used, and if not, should it be removed?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 hours ago | comment | added | Destroy666 |
I'd say the PowerShell usage is pretty much useless - the extension doesn't tell anything extra about the question 99.99% of the time, powershell tag is enough, PS1 variable is much more specific and better fit - but don't think bash-ps1 is accurate as it applies to lots of shells.
|
|
| Jul 25 at 14:57 | comment | added | Journeyman Geek Mod | Or possibly bash-ps1 (or appropriate language) and powershell-ps1 . Wierdly not entirely sure what's the convention here | |
| Jul 25 at 13:26 | comment | added | JW0914 |
@JourneymanGeek IBM PS/1 is a single question for 34yr old hardware, and seems unlikely to garnish more than a handful of questions in the coming decades =] (if going that route, it seems like a tag for it would make more sense as ps-1 since that would also apply to PS/1 hardware like legacy keyboard/mice). .ps1 is a widely used file extension on billions of files and billions of machines since every Windows install comes with more than one .ps1 file, and would seem to make more sense to treat it as a file extension like batch-file, sh, etc. (if not ps1, perhaps ps1-file?)
|
|
| Jul 25 at 13:15 | history | edited | JW0914 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Typo correction
|
| Jul 25 at 12:37 | comment | added | Journeyman Geek Mod | A quick glance shows a question about an IBM PS1 ._. - I wonder if a clearer tag for the PS usage + retagging everything else makes sense | |
| Jul 25 at 12:01 | history | asked | JW0914 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |